Prediction of Lea Ma [382nd] vs Lexington Reed [867th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W W L L
Form
W W L W W W W L L LHead To Head: Ma 1 - 0 Reed
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ma winning 2 and Reed winning 0. The last match between Ma and Reed was at the W35 Miami, 08-11-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Lea Ma getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lea Ma | 1 |
| Lexington Reed | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Lea Ma
Player
Lexington Reed
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:19:0 | Average Match Time | 1:19:0 |
| 61% (31/51) | 1st Serve % | 65% (39/60) |
| 65% (20/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 14% (3/21) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 60% (36/60) | Return Points Win % | 41% (21/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lea Ma vs Lexington Reed Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ma 1 - 0 Reed
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ma has won 37.91% of points on their second serve, while Reed has won 36.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ma, in recent form, has won 44.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Reed has won 49.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.42% and 33.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ma has saved 52.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Reed has saved 40.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ma has won 66.04% of matches played (W/L 35/ 18), with Reed winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ma has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 17/ 11). Reed has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 33/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 16/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Ma has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.04% of matches (W/L 35/ 18), where as Reed has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ma winning 1 times and Reed being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ma winning 2 and Reed winning 0. The last match between Ma and Reed was at the W35 Miami, 08-11-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Lea Ma getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ma and Reed have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ma winning 0 times and Reed 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ma winning 0, and Reed 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ma has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.42 while Reed has played against players with an average rank of 81.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ma has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Reed has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ma has converted 41.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Reed has converted 40.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Lea Ma vs Lexington Reed Best Odds For The Match
Lea Ma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Lea Ma
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Lea Ma
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Salma Ewing
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
43
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariia Tkacheva
Player
Lea Ma
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
50%
(
47 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Victoria Hu
50%
(
13 of
26)
1st Serve %
44%
(
14 of
32)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Martina Alejandra Piotti
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lexington Reed Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Lexington Reed
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
98)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ariana Anazagasty-Pursoo
Player
Lexington Reed
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Lexington Reed
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lexington Reed
Player
Jada Robinson
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexington Reed
Player
Sohyun Park
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
14 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lexington Reed
Player
Unknown Player
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-0 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mary Stoiana
Player
Lexington Reed
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexington Reed
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lexington Reed
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ma vs Reed?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ma Vs Reed is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (75/44) | Win/Loss | 52% (49/46) |
| 63% (162/97) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (111/109) |
| 56% (1314/1015) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1030/1030) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 275 | Aces Total | 36 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 194 | Total Double Faults | 192 |
| 1:29:27 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 227.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 91 |
| 60% (3852/6465) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1861/3161) |
| 65% (2511/3852) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1109/1861) |
| 48% (1259/2612) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (536/1300) |
| 50% (446/885) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (179/389) |
| 47% (3270/6892) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1430/3136) |
| 67% (75/112) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (49/95) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (9/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (10/15) |
| 58% (14/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 90% (79/71) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (51/44) |
| 10% (79/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (51/7) |
| 10% (40/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (44/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
